Survey finds physicians very wary of doctor ratings.
نویسنده
چکیده
Of those who participated in the poll, 31 percent said they worked for health systems, while 24 percent worked at hospitals and 20 percent at group practices. Other answers included private practice (12 percent), academic health centers (9 percent) and managed care/insurance (1 percent). The largest number of respondents said their primary job title was medical director (147), followed by chief medical officer (115). Other titles included staff physician (103), department chair (47), vice president of medical affairs (27) and CEO (22). Although most of the respondents (69 percent) acknowledged they had checked their profiles on an online consumer website that rates physicians, a majority said they believed use of these sites among patients is low. About 55 percent believed 25 percent or fewer patients have used an online physician rating site, and an additional 35 percent put the number between 25 and 50 percent. Only 1 percent of respondents believed more than 75 percent of patients had used the sites. Among the physician leaders who said they had checked their online profile, most consulted Healthgrades.com (89 percent). Also popular were Vitals.com (33 percent) and Angie’s List (19 percent). Other sites listed by respondents were Yelp.com (13 percent), Doctorscorecard.com (9 percent), Ratemds.com (9 percent) and Mdnationwide.org (1 percent). Of the physicians who checked their online profiles, 39 percent said they agreed with their rating, and 42 percent said they partially agreed. Nineteen percent of the respondents said they didn’t agree. Of the physician leaders who said they hadn’t checked their online profile, 28 percent said their reason was because they were too busy. Another 21 percent said they didn’t think patients used them. The majority —51 percent—listed “other” and filled in their own reasons. Among them: In this article...
منابع مشابه
Physician Rating Websites: an Analysis of Physician Evaluation and Physician Perception
Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate current physician ratings websites (PRWs) to determine whichfactors correlated to higher physician scores and evaluate physician perspective of PRWs.Methods: This study evaluated two popular websites, Healthgrades.com and Vitals.com, to gather information onpracticing physician members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society database. A surv...
متن کاملBecause of Science You Also Die...; Comment on “Quaternary Prevention, an Answer of Family Doctors to Over Medicalization”
The concept of quaternary prevention (P4) refers to the idea that medicine has acquired the ability to damage through the proper exercise. Family medicine or general practice has the duty of recovering the ethical values and the exercise of a profession with the doctor-patient relationship serving to people’s humanity. In the fourth Congress of Family and Community Medicine, held in Montevideo ...
متن کاملCorrelates of patient satisfaction with physician visit: Differences between elderly and non-elderly survey respondents
BACKGROUND Few studies document differences in patient satisfaction with physicians in the elderly (> or = 65 years) and compare it to non-elderly (<65 years) patients. METHODS A cross-sectional survey study on a convenience sample of 20,901 patients rated their recent visit to a physician through a web-based survey. Survey included validated questions based on aspects of physician care pract...
متن کاملObstetrician-gynaecologists' opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Conscientious refusal of abortion has been discussed widely by medical ethicists but little information on practitioners' opinions exists. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued recommendations about conscientious refusal. We used a vignette experiment to examine obstetrician-gynecologists' (OB/GYN) support for the recommendations. DESI...
متن کاملDo Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period
BACKGROUND Physician-rating websites (PRWs) may lead to quality improvements in case they enable and establish a peer-to-peer communication between patients and physicians. Yet, we know little about whether and how physicians respond on the Web to patient ratings. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe trends in physicians' Web-based responses to patient ratings over time, to i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Physician executive
دوره 39 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013